NettetJolly George Verghese v. Bank of Cochin, Supreme Court of India, 4 February 1980 India Case-law Other topics relating to IHL Internal legal order Date: 04.02.1980 … Nettet4. nov. 2024 · Jolly George Verghese v. The Bank of Cochin 1980 (2) Supreme Court Reports 913. In the cited authority, the decree-holder/bank in execution of the decree …

Jolly George Verghese v. The Bank Of Cochin - Decision of 04

NettetThe appellants were the judgment-debtors while the respondent-bank was the decree-holder. In execution of the decree a warrant for arrest and detention in civil prison was … Nettet10. jan. 2024 · Article 11- protects the individual against breach of contract, in Jolly George Verghese v. Bank of Cochin, AIR 1980 [11], it was held by the Supreme Court that to cast a person in prison because of his poverty and consequent inability to meet his contractual liability is a violation of Article 21 of the Constitution. thad shunkwiler

Opio v Obote & 2 Ors (MICELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATIONS No.

Nettet30. apr. 2024 · Jolly George Varghese & Anr. v. Bank of Cochin. Jolly George Varghese & Anr. v. Bank of Cochin. 13 min read. COLUMNS Universal Declaration of Human … NettetThe judgment-debtors (appellants) suffered a decree against them in O.S. No. 57 of 1972 in a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs, the respondent-bank being the decree-holder. There are two other money decrees against the appellants (in O.S. 92 of 1972 and 94 of 1974), the total sum payable by them being over Rs. 7 lakhs. NettetIn support of his contention, learned counsel relied upon the judgments reported in Jolly Geores Vercgesc v. The Bank of Cochin, AIR 1980 SC 470 : 1980 (2) SCR 913. lyyam Perumal v. Chinna Goundem, AIR 1984 Mad 239 and the decision in Kunhi Raman v. Madhavan Nair, 1957 (2) Mad LJ 28 : (AIR 1957 Mad 761). 3. thad smotherman