Jolly george varghese v. bank of cochin
NettetTo support this point the court referred to the cases Gramophone Company of India Lt v Birendra Bahadur Pandey and Others and Jolly George Varghese and Another v Bank of Cochin. In both these cases, it was held that the rules and requirements of international law may be accommodated into municipal law even without express legislative consent NettetSupreme Court of India Supreme Court of India Jolly George Verghese & Anr vs The Bank Of Cochin on 4 February, 1980 Equivalent citations: 1980 AIR 470, 1980 SCR …
Jolly george varghese v. bank of cochin
Did you know?
Nettetread with Order 21 rule 37 CPC in Jolly George Varghese v Bank of Cochin1stating that ‘to be poor is no crime’. To state the obvious there are several other stakeholders who file claim petitions before the court executing a decree (hereinafter referred as … Nettet4. okt. 2024 · In the case of Jolly George Varghese & Anr. v. Bank of Cochin, J. Krishna Iyer observed that though a provision is present in ICCPR but not in Indian Constitution, does not make the covenant an enforceable part of ‘Corpus Juris’ in India. Provisions of ICCPR along with corresponding provision of Constitution of India are as follows:
Nettet16. jan. 2015 · Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin [1980] AIR 470 (SC). C.K. Takwani, Civil Procedure (6th, Eastern Book Co, Lucknow 2006) 506. MP Jain, The Code of Civil Procedure (3rd, LexisNexis Butterworths, Nagpur 2012) 211. State of Haryana v. Darshana Devi [1979] 184 SCR (3). Ibid. NettetCourt in Jolly George Varghese and another v. The Bank of Cochin[(1980) 2 SCC 360] in support of the contention that the JDr cannot be subjected to arrest and cannot be imprisoned when he has no means at present to pay the decree debt and when it cannot be said that he is wilfully and deliberately
NettetfJolly George Verghese & Anr vs The Bank Of Cochin on 4 February, 1980 judgment-debtors and in consequence all their immovable properties had been attached for the … NettetYou need to enable JavaScript to run this app.
Nettet18. jul. 2024 · Jolly George Varghese and Anr. v/s Bank of Cochin, 1972 FACTS OF THE CASE The appellant, in this case, suffered a decree worth over Rs. 2.5 lakhs. The Bank of Cochin was the holder of the decree. Two other decrees had already been instituted against the appellant which were a net sum of Rs. 7 lakhs.
Nettet27. jun. 2024 · The court will first look at local legislation, and if the municipal legislation is silent on an issue, the court will turn to Customary International for help; the SC has done this before, and the court did the same thing in the case of Jolly George Varghese and an. V. The Bank OF Cochin. U. K. feb1111Nettet8. jan. 2010 · Relying on the judgments of the Supreme Court in Jolly George Varghese v. The Bank of Cochin AIR 1980 SC 470 and Ram Narayan Agarwal v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1983) 4 SCC 276, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. Aman Vachher that there was no justification whatsoever for the DFC to issue any … hotel 5 star bangkokNettetJolly George Varghese and Anr. v. Bank of Cochin Facts The judgement-debtor (appellants) suffered a decree against them in a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs, wherein the respondent-bank was the decree-holder. … feb 11-11-baNettet29. feb. 2024 · Bank of Cochin[8]. In this case, the Honourable Supreme Court of India, in the words of Justice Krishna Iyer, said that the positive commitment of the States … hotel 5 palm jumeirah dubaiNettet30. jul. 2024 · Jolly George Verghese & Anr vs The Bank Of Cochin. Bench: Justice V.R. Krishnaiyer and Justice R.S. Pathak. Appellant: Jolly George Verghese & Anr. … hotel 5 star di kuala lumpurNettet9. nov. 2024 · The basic difference between these two is that judgement determines the right and liabilities of the parties and decree plays an important role in defining the scope and limitation of any individual. A decree is the operating part of the judgement and it has to be as per the judgement. feb 11NettetJolly George Varghese and Anr. V/s Bank of Cochin. Facts of the case The judgement-debtor (appellants) suffered a decree against them during a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs, wherein the respondent-bank was the decree-holder. there have been two other money decrees against the appellants, the entire sum payable by them amounting to over Rs. 7 lakhs. … hotel 5 star di kuala terengganu